<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Artistic Energies &#187; gaston bachelard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.artisticenergies.com/wordpress/tag/gaston-bachelard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.artisticenergies.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:33:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Poetics of Space &#8211; current reading</title>
		<link>http://www.artisticenergies.com/wordpress/2010/02/poetics-of-space-current-reading/</link>
		<comments>http://www.artisticenergies.com/wordpress/2010/02/poetics-of-space-current-reading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[immersive art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaston bachelard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imagination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artisticenergies.com/wordpress/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m about 30 pages in to Gaston Bachelard&#8217;s Poetics of Space. I may just be overly involved in the link between spaces and imagination (and therefore blind to what a normal person would read), but this one looks like it&#8217;s going to be a &#8220;must&#8221; for our thinking. The main thing I&#8217;m getting so far [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m about 30 pages in to <a title="google books" href="http://books.google.com/books?id=CVklE1ouVYIC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;dq=gaston%20bachelard%20poetics%20of%20space&amp;pg=PP1#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false">Gaston Bachelard&#8217;s </a><em><a title="google books" href="http://books.google.com/books?id=CVklE1ouVYIC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;dq=gaston%20bachelard%20poetics%20of%20space&amp;pg=PP1#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false">Poetics of Space</a></em>. I may just be overly involved in the link between spaces and imagination (and therefore blind to what a normal person would read), but this one looks like it&#8217;s going to be a &#8220;must&#8221; for our thinking. The main thing I&#8217;m getting so far &#8211; other than great ideas about how poetry happens &#8211; is about the imaginatively shaping work of our childhood homes. They are a sort of &#8220;first universe&#8221; for our imaginations &#8211; a place in which we learn to dream, and to which we often return in revery and thought. I see plenty of direct relation to our earlier post on Lewis&#8217; ideas on medieval cosmos &#8211; an inhabitable universe. Both Lewis and Bachelard seem to be getting at an amazing idea: we cannot imagine and live within a void, even if it is more &#8220;real&#8221; than our value-laden experience of spaces.</p>
<p><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=CVklE1ouVYIC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;dq=gaston%20bachelard%20poetics%20of%20space&amp;pg=PP1#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false"><img class="alignnone" title="poetics of space - old cover" src="http://www.librairiepantoute.com/img/couvertures_300/poetique-de-espace-09.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="472" /></a></p>
<p>In Cube terms, this type of work gives us insight into what shapes our imagination &#8211; as well as some of the how and why (embodied, inhabited, childhood spaces versus those that we experience in general). In some ways, it perhaps is a work that offers some direction in terms of large-scale film: it can&#8217;t get &#8220;thin&#8221; in terms of physicality and what <a title="google books" href="http://books.google.com/books?id=IWe96NDQioEC&amp;lpg=PP1&amp;ots=knbwF1o8w6&amp;dq=james%20wood%20how%20fiction%20works&amp;pg=PP1#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false">James Wood</a> calls &#8220;thisness&#8221; &#8211; the quality of particularity that we look for in fiction. At the same time, with <a title="august 25 2009 post" href="http://www.artisticenergies.com/wordpress/2009/08/eliasson-nature-and-renewal-of-sight/">projects like Olafur Eliasson&#8217;s</a>, it seems equally clear that experiences of extreme simplicity (say, a monochromatic room) can still meet this criterion (I think) by virtue of their focus and sensory particularity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.artisticenergies.com/wordpress/2010/02/poetics-of-space-current-reading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
